Monday, May 10, 2021
Protect Your Immune System Today!
Home U.S Citi made a $500 million mistake. Here's how that would play out...

Citi made a $500 million mistake. Here’s how that would play out for regular people

A federal judge ruled that the wire transfers made by Citi (C), who was acting as Revlon’s loan agent, were “final and complete transactions, not subject to revocation.” However, in most instances of mistakenly receiving wired transfers, that’s not the case. In fact, you would have to pay the money back — or face criminal charges.
That’s because of a common law doctrine known as “unjust enrichment”, which generally obligates that a recipient of money wired by mistake is required to return the money to the sender. A Pennsylvania couple faced felony charges in 2019 after spending $120,000 accidentally deposited in their account.

But there is an exception that applied in Citigroup’s case under a New York law. This law was brought forward by precedent in a 1991 case where New York’s Court of Appeals ruled that if a third party mistakenly sends money to a creditor, the creditor can keep the funds.

That exception, called the discharge-for-value rule, allows the recipient to keep funds accidentally wired to them if the mistakenly transferred money was unprompted, relieves a valid debt, and the recipient wasn’t aware the payment was made in error.

This was deemed to be the case with Revlon’s (REV) lenders.

“The discharge-for-value defense ultimately turns on whether Defendants (or, more precisely, their clients) were on constructive notice of Citibank’s mistake at the moment they received the August 11th wire transfers,” said US District Court Judge Jesse Furman in his decision. “Based on the credible testimony of Defendants’ employees and the documentary record, the Court concludes that they were not.”

Revlon lenders stated they believed the transfers from Citibank were prepayments for an outstanding loan — which wasn’t due to be paid off until 2023. “The transfer matched to the penny the amount of principal and interest outstanding on the loan,” the judge said.

Therefore, the court ruled it was reasonable for Revlon lenders to believe the payments were not made in error.

“Citibank is one of the most sophisticated financial institutions in the world. Thus, Defendants and their clients could assume — and did, in fact, assume — that the bank had effective internal controls to avoid significant mistakes,” the decision reads.

Citigroup said it intends to appeal the decision.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Medina Spirit’s Kentucky Derby win in doubt after failing postrace drug test

Speaking to reporters Sunday morning, Baffert denied that the horse had ever been treated with the drug, saying his team would conduct its...

Lewis Hamilton recovers to overtake Max Verstappen and win fifth straight Spanish Grand Prix

These two rivals have been battling for race wins in each of the four grands prix so far this season, but Hamilton's victory...

Canelo Alvarez stops Billy Joe Saunders in front of record 73,126 fans in Texas

The attendance figure set an all-time record for an indoor US boxing event -- breaking the previous record set in 1978 when Muhammad...

Bayern Munich wins ninth consecutive Bundesliga title

The German side secured its ninth consecutive Bundesliga title on Saturday, after second place RB Leipzig -- the only side still able to...

Recent Comments